EVOLUTION OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Evolution of HRM over the period of time is important for understanding the philosophy, functions, and practices of HRM that are followed in different situations so that relevant HRM practices are evolved in the present situation.
Human Resource Management (HRM) is relatively a very recent term
considered for managing human resources in an organization.
EVOLUTION OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
In 19th century Industrial revolution comprises of the development of machinery, usage of
mechanical energy and the existence of the concept of the factory with ample
manpower. The old cottage system was replaced by the factory system. Under this
system, there were various changes introduced such as the mechanical process,
migration of workers from their place to other places and communication between
the workers and the owners. Three systems of HRM were introduced under this
system such as the hiring of workers, training and controlling them properly.
The master-servant philosophy was used to keep control over these workers.
Close
to the 19th century
in Trade Union Movement With the emergence of
the factory system, the workers started to establish their own union on the
basis of their common interest which was named as Trade Unions. The basic aim
behind these associations was to protect the interest of the members and deal
with the grievances of the workers that may arise due to child labor, long
hours of work and pathetic working conditions.Other working issues also became
prevalent such as economic issues, fewer wages, worker’s benefits and other
services. To give a backfire to these problems, the Trade Union did strikes,
slowdowns, walkouts, boycott and so on as their underlined weapon. All these
issues reflected the need for employee Grievance handling system, disciplinary
practices; expand the benefits of employees, holidays and vacation time and
defensible structure for a wage.
Beginning
of the 20th century a humanistic, as well as paternalistic approach Social Responsibility Era was
adopted towards the factory workers. At the short note, it signifies that the
worker is like a child for their owner and the owner is the father who took
care of the entire labor.Some additional facilities and concessions are given
to the labor by the industrialists who were working on this policy such
minimize the hours of working, improved working conditions, shelters to workers
and so on. This is a social approach that was adopted to combat the problem of
workers and it is considered as a welfare scheme to control the workers.
Taylor
started looking for some technical approaches to increase the worker’s
productivity at the beginning of the 20th century. He wrote
some of the scientific techniques that are relevant to manage the workforce.
The management of the workers is relevant to the scientific management
techniques such as functional foremanship, standardization and simplification
of work and differential wage rate system.
some of the principles of Scientific Management are given below
Replacement of rule of thumb with science
Not conflicts but only harmony
Cooperation and say no to individualism
Growth of each worker
More focus was put on the human factor at work and what affected
the people’s behavior during the 1920’s. During this Human
Relations Era it was highly recommended to use psychology while doing personnel
testing, interviewing, attitude measurement as well as learning also.Basically,
the period was defined as “Industrial Psychological Era” in the year 1924. After conducted deep
research by the professors of Harvard Business School, it was observed that the
productivity of the workers depends on social factors at work, formation and
influence of groups, the nature of leadership and supervision and
communication. It was concluded that the management ought to maintain human
relations at work along with physical conditions to increase productivity.
On the contrary 1950 to the happy workers are good workers, the behavioral
scientists suggesting that the behavior of a human be the highlighted aspect.
Various research methodologies are used to comprehend the nature of the job as
well as people in the working atmosphere.
These are some of the major
conclusions made by the behavioral
science era that are given below:
People like their work but there is a need to establish some goals
so that they can work proerly to achieve them in a timely manner. It also
increases their job satisfacion
Employee genarate maxmum creativity as compare to how much it is
needed.But their potential is not utilized in a good manner
Usage of the untapped potential of an employee is duty of managers
An environment ought to be created so that people can contribute
in the best possble way and this must be done by the manager
The expansion of subordinate's influence, self-direction and
self-control can improve the operating efficiency
1960 onwards systems and Contingency
Approach era, is seeking a high level of attention. It is a cooperated
approach that signifies the empirical data to manage the human resources. It is
attached with a huge idea of analyzing the objects that must depend on the
analysis involving simultaneous variables that are mutually dependent on each
other.
1980 0nwards a huge number of people started working in factories
when there was a replacement of the old cottage system with the factory system.
Then, there was a need for hiring, developing and keeping an eye over the
workers. With this intention, the department of industrial relations emerged in
most of the big business firms.
By the time, the scope of the industrial relations department was extended as
the conflicts arose between the supervisory staff too. Then, it was renamed as
Personnel department.
With the increasing competition within the business sector, the competition for
talent, skills, abilities and knowledge also touched the sky and it reflected
the need for the good human management team. Further, the manpower was
considered as socio-psychological beings for the achievement of organizational
goals, not as physiological beings. It changed the nomenclature of the
personnel department and sheds light on the Human Resource Department.
With the sway of all these advancements in the area of Human Resource Department, the largest professional association also changed the name from American Society for Personnel Administration to the Society for Human Resource Management in the year 1990. In addition to this, the academic studies named as “Personnel Management” also converted to “Human Resource Management”. Now, the department of Human Resource is of great value for any organization whether it is big or small.
So it was all about Evolution and History of Human Resource Management.
If you liked it then please comment below.
References
https://101hrm.com/evolution-of-human-resource-management/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kxc8KceOb14
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1-v8ObpZzg
Nice article on how HR evolves from past to present.Looking forward for more in future.
ReplyDeleteThanks Madusha for your comments.
DeleteHi Ruvini
ReplyDeleteExplain in detail how HRM changes through time and how HR helps the organizations achieve its goals and objectives.
great work
Thanks.
DeleteGreat article! You have discussed the evolutionary stages of HRM very interestingly. We can clearly understand the different approaches that were taken in various eras in order to enhance the organizational growth and performance. Expecting to read more on how this evolution has been impacted on modern day HRM practices.
ReplyDeleteYes dinusha.evolution HR is nice story
DeleteWell explained the article on evolution. It is important to understand the past to create new methods and practices that give actual value to the subject.
ReplyDeleteNice style ... Ruwini. Any one can get clear idea on this.
ReplyDeleteWell expalined and can get a clear idea about evolution of HRM
ReplyDeleteHi Ruvini, well explained, few Comment- when we working with medium level of companies they have still using Personal management concepts;
ReplyDeletewhy is that?
Is practically these evaluation doesn't exit ?
people are not willing to change?
or Employers/Companies are not willing to change?
Evaluations are a mechanism to provide feedback and documentation about an employee's performance through a defined time period, and can provide clear communication of job expectations and goals.
ReplyDeleteIt would be better if you would done a comparison to distinguish the differences.
ReplyDeleteIt is better to observe before predicting about the future & make decisions & you clearly explained about the evolution.
ReplyDeleteYou have clearly said about evelution of HRM.that is essential thing in HRM
ReplyDelete